The banner of Imam Hussein raises on the rock of Trolltunga in Norway / Pics

On the begging of the month of Muharram (Lunar Month), a Lebanese man resident of Norway raised the banner of Imam Hussain (A) over one of the most dangerous places of the world the rock of ‘Trolltunga’

Trolltunga (Troll’s tongue) is a piece of rock jutting horizontally out of a mountain about 700 metres (2,300 ft) above the north side of the lake Ringedalsvatnet in the municipality of Odda in Hordaland county, Norway. The cliff is located east of the Skjeggedal area, about 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) east of the village of Tyssedal and the Sørfjorden (a branch off of the main Hardanger Fjord). The name translated to English is The Troll’s tongue.



In a Shocking Decision French Politician Reverts to Islam

In a shocking decision to Marine Le Pen’s party, a French far-right councilor has reverted to Islam, sending a video message to officials of the anti-immigration party to praise the Muslims’ holy book, the Qur’an, and asking them to join him.

“Both are demonized and very far from the image portrayed in the media,” Maxence Buttey, a councilor in the eastern Paris suburb of Noisy-le-Grand, told Le Parisien newspaper, drawing up similarities between the Front National party and Islam, The Telegraph reported.

“Like Islam, the FN defends the weakest. The party denounces exorbitant interest rates charged on the debt of our country, and Islam is against the practice of usury.”

Buttey, 22, reverted to Islam recently.

Yet, his decision became known after he send officials of the anti-immigration FN party a video in which he praised the “visionary” virtues of the Qur’an and urged them to become Muslims.

The video was a shock to many members of the party, which announced suspending Buttey from a regional FN committee.

“Religion is a private choice which I respect but it must not enter into the sphere of our political activities,” Jordan Bardella, a local party secretary, said.

“The proselytizing video which Maxence sent out is unacceptable.”

France is home to a Muslim community of nearly 6.5 million, the largest in Europe.

Le Pan’s party has been adopting anti-Islam agenda for years. She took over the National Front from her father, party founder Jean-Marie Le Pen, who has several convictions for racism and anti-Semitism.

Le Pen has objected to schools serving Halal meat for Muslim pupils, a controversial issue in France, which has banned the wearing of the full-face veil in public and headscarves in state schools.

She also compared Muslim street prayers to Nazi occupation in a speech given during a rally in 2010.

Buttey, who remains a party member and a councilor, said he found Islam after finding it difficult to believe the official version of 9/11 attacks.

Moreover, he had doubts about the “Merah affair”, referring to the al-Qaeda inspired French gunman, Mohammed Merah, who killed seven people in the south of France in 2012.

“Some of my voters will be disappointed by my choice,” Buttey admitted.

“But I’m ready to explain to them that Islam has a mission to unite all men and women.”

The new Muslim reverts defended Islam against false campaigns propagated about it.

“I am against the niqab [full-face veil],” he said, adding that Islam did not call for believers “to cut off heads as the Islamic State group does.”

Buttey said he had decided to revert after lengthy discussions with the local imam, whom he met while campaigning for election earlier this year.

“I was Catholic but when I reread the Bible I noticed all its inconsistencies,” he said.

“When I read the Qur’an thoroughly, I understood that this religion is more open.”

Buttey is not the first far-right politician who finds Islam after long study.

In 2013, Arnoud Van Doorn, a former member of the far-right Freedom Party (PVV), embraced Islam after an extensive study into the religion.

He was among party leaders who helped produce an offensive film titled Fitna in 2008 that linked Islam and the Qur’an to violence.

But after Muslim outcry at the movie, Doorn began to read more about Islam and Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him), leading him to embrace Islam in 2013.

/129

Sheikh Zakzaky: Karbala event is a test for the Ummah

NIGERIA – The Leader of the Shiite Islamic Movement Sheikh Ibraheem Zakzaky further spoke on the issue of Ashura tragedy on the 3rd day of Ashura gathering in Zaria, Nigeria. He said, the issue of Karbala is a test for the  Believers  and as for Unbelievers they  can never  outmaneuver Allah. Imam Husain (A) and his followers were tested and they passed the test.

This is one of the ways Allah test those who have faith, and those who are faithless and went astray after clear evidence to them is the curse of Allah.

Karbala, where Imam Hussain (A) and his followers were killed, is now a city of millions. The desert of karbala is a land of glory as Occupiers of Heaven see light emanating from the land of Karbala. Its sand is used for prostration during Sallah for its blessings.  The killings of Imam Husain (A)  on the land was foretold by the holy Prophet as reported.

On the killing of the holy Imam, Sheikh said Allah executes his affairs base on wisdom, thus, left this to happen while He is ever powerful to abort it. There is wisdom behind the incident. Also, He sent his messengers  to guide people to  the rights. Others attempted to kill them to frustrate the message. Allah in his wisdom protected Prophet Muhammad(SAWA)  against being killed,  at which killing  him means ‘killing’ the message altogether. The prophet succeeded in delivering the message of Allah amid much sufferings and persecution in the process.

The holy Mecca, where the Prophet left out of persecution of believers, he eventually made victorious entry to it. The Arabs were overpowered and they submitted unwillingly. He set the captives free out of his mercy.  They submitted to him not by their  choice. The Prophet established Islam.  When departing the world , he appointed his brother Ali as his successor.  They disobeyed Ali (A) and eventually killed him at last. They also killed Hassan (A).

With all this, they were not satisfied as they finally unleashed their anger in totality on Imam Hussain (A) . They even mentioned it at Karbala addressing the Imam: ‘we will kill you for the enmity we have of your father’. And they committed the horrific incident in the history of humanity.

So, Karbala divided the Ummah into two: The believers who are with Imam Hussain and  his enemies on the other side.  Had Allah wished He could have given upper hand to Imam Hussain, as he gave to the Prophet (SAWA) against unbelievers,  but Allah wanted to test the believers.  With this test, true believers are differentiated from the hypocrites who might be with Imam Hussain should he got upper hand.

In karbala only those with true faith defended Imam Hussain and martyred with him. They are the champions and victorious.

Alas, After Imam Husain was martyred his lovers and supporters became very few even in Mecca, a situation that may be the opposite had it been Imam Hussain got upper hand and had power.

The issue of Karbala shows that many things are covered going by the way its opponents continue to label the gatherings as wrong and innovation. More issues will continue to emerge during mourning gatherings as those things covered will eventually come to light.
















Israel to build Palestinian-only city

Israel is planning to build a Palestinian-only city in the northernmost part of Israel in a bid to decrease the number of Palestinians living in mostly Jewish-populated areas.

According to Israeli media outlets, the city is to be built near the coastal city of Acre (Akka) at the northern extremity of Haifa Bay, next to the Jdeideh Makr Arab community.  

It is still unclear when the city is to be built and its municipal status is still unclear.

Many of Palestinians have condemned construction of the planned city, which is designed to accommodate a population of 40,000.

They say establishing a city for a specific population group is unethical and that all ethnic groups should be permitted to live there.

According to reports, Israel’s Housing and Construction Ministry has been engaged in designing the city for the past four years, after the decision to construct it was made in a 2008 cabinet meeting.

SRK/NT/AS

Media: Release Gitmo videotapes

Media outlets in the United States on Monday demanded the immediate release of Guantanamo force-feeding videos, despite the US government’s appeal to a court.

Washington claims that releasing the videos would compromise national security.

A US federal judge had ordered the government to publicly release videotapes of a Syrian hunger-striking prisoner who was force-fed at the notorious US-run Guantanamo prison in early October.

The court is due to rule on the tapes’ release in the beginning of November.

Rear Admiral Kyle Cozad, the commander of the US Guantanamo joint task force, said, “Releasing the videos as the court has ordered will give rise to security and operational harms” to the Guantanamo operation.

He added that the videos show Abu Wa’el Dhiab being force-fed and the location of prison guards and the room used during the practice.

Forty-three-year-old Dhiab from Syria started his hunger strike 18 months ago to protest his indefinite confinement without charge. He is protesting force-feeding procedures administered by prison authorities. Lawyers for the prisoner said his treatment was abusive.

“It is hard to imagine a more explicit description of the process utilized than that which is found on videotapes of the actual execution,” Cozad said.

The 16 news groups said the videos have been withheld for other reasons.

“This is a case of the government seeking secrecy to prevent accountability, not to protect national security,” said the news outlets, which include The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Guardian.

“There is no imminent threat of a public release that might compromise national security,” they argued in a court document.

Dozens of prisoners at Guantanamo have engaged in hunger strikes for years to protest their confinement.

However, US officials no longer disclose how many of the 149 prisoners at the base are on hunger strike and meet the guidelines for force-feeding.

GJH/GJH

‘Iraq, Syria can contain terror alone’

A senior Iranian official has hailed a recent victory by the Iraqi army against the ISIL Takfiri militants, saying the triumph proves that Iraq and Syria can contain the terrorist group on their own.

The Iraqi military, supported by volunteer forces, succeeded in mopping up the last of ISIL Takfiri militants in the town of Jurf al-Sakhar, near the capital Baghdad on Monday.

 Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister for Arab and African Affairs Hossein Amir-Abdollahian congratulated the Iraqi nation, government, and armed forces on the victory.

“The mop-up operation in Jurf al-Sakhar by the Iraqi armed and volunteer forces and without foreign intervention can serve as the best example for freeing and clearing areas in Iraq and Syria of Takfiri terrorists,” the top diplomat said.

“This successful operation proved that the Iraqi government and people defend their sovereignty, independence, national unity, and territorial integrity,” he added.

The army has been fighting the terrorist group for nearly six months now.

The ISIL terrorists currently control large areas of land across Syria and Iraq. They have committed terrible atrocities in both countries, including mass executions and beheading of local residents as well as foreign nationals.

IA/NT/AS

Imam Hussein Holy Shrine Radio Channel Celebrates Ninth Anniversary

980defd0471c99d21afcf00b44500d05

The Imam Hussein Holy Shrine Radio Channel celebrated its ninth anniversary since its establishment with the attendance of numerous officials.

Jaffar El-Bazi, Head of the Radio Channel states that the channel has experienced huge development over the past years and it is evident through the extensive hard work of its committee. The channel has also seen great success through the broadcasted scientific, cultural, and political programs; and the expansion to Kuwait.

Furthermore, Negah El-Arsani, Holy Shrine Media Consultant states that despite the rough times the channel has gone through, it has never stopped spreading of the message of Imam Hussein (Peace Be Upon Him).

/129

Yemen military rallies behind the Houthis against Al Qaeda … at last!

By Catherine Shakdam

If Yemen has, by any account, existed in a semi-permanent state of crisis and tumult over the past three years, plagued by political instability and over-bearing foreign manipulations, this poorest nation of the Arabian Peninsula quite literally stared absolute devastation in the face as Al Qaeda rose to fight the Houthis earlier this October.

Only days within the political agreement which saw President Abdo Rabbo Mansour Hadi gave in to Abdel-Malek Al Houthi’s demands for meaningful change, in keeping with popular demands and the spirit of Yemen National Dialogue resolutions, Al Qaeda militants staged a series of terror attacks across the country, targeting the very men who enabled the Yemeni people to reclaim control over their destiny.

Formerly the pariah of Yemen politics due to their affiliation to Shia Islam, a sect which has suffered dearly under Saudi Arabia’s influence, the Houthis of Yemen have risen the undisputed winner of 2011 revolution, having been able to reinvent themselves the people’s champion and fly the flag of democracy as well as social inclusion.

Politically organized under the denomination, Ansar Allah, the group proved itself an inspiration for hundreds of thousands of disillusioned Yemenis, very much the carrier of a new hope for the country. Under Abdel-Malek al Houthi’s impetus, the Houthis tore down Yemen’s veil of falsehood and web of political deceits, exposing to the nation the games which politicians and officials had played for many decades in order to advance their ambitions, and of course amass fortunes.

The further the Houthis advanced in the highlands against Islamists and their tribal militants, the more apparent Yemen’s terror deception became.

By the time the Houthis asserted their control in late September over the capital, Sana’a, having neutralized all opposition, Yemenis woke up to the fact that Al Qaeda had been but a proxy for Riyadh, a weapon used to destabilize the nation and prevent real progress to ever materialize.

As noted by Abdelrahman Jamil, a political commentator, back in September, Saudi Arabia “does not wantto see Yemen as stable, it doesn’t want to see Yemen as a different country, and it doesn’t want to see Yemen as an independent republic or whatever it is.”

As early as Yemen’s first crack at democracy in the early 60s, Saudi Arabia has stood in the shadows, playing politicians and factions against each other to create “manageable chaos” and thus ensure that Yemen would never rise to be the threat Al Saud inherently understand will signal its house’s demise.

Fighting Terror

Because the Houthis directly faced Al Saud’s religious wrath for over three decades, having endured and weathered systematic oppression under the rule of the Salafis and Wahhabis – religious radicals who have proven to harbour suspicious ties to terror groups such as Al Qaeda – whose militants enjoyed unparalleled financial, military and political support from Riyadh; did the faction understand how vital it was for Yemen to extirpate itself from under fanatics’ thumb.

Accustomed to religious terrorism for they lived under its direct shadow, the Houthis immediately recognized the historical opportunity which 2011 offered the Yemeni nation. As Yemen’s first protesters took to the streets Al Houthi pledged his support and his protection to the people, regardless of their political affiliations and religious beliefs, keen to project a sense of unity and nationalism as the country advanced on the road to democracy.

Three years on and Al Houthi has remained true to his promise.

Three years after Yemen rose in anger to denounce nepotism and injustice, the Houthis managed what many thought impossible when they dislodged the last remnants of the former regime – Al Islah, thus breaking the nation free of its shackles.

But if such victory was hailed a defining moment in Yemen’s history, a turning point not just for the country but the region, Islamists soon proved that they were not done just yet.

As Yemen rejoiced, ready to write the next chapter of its transition of power, Al Qaeda pointed its devilish nose, determined to drown the unsuspecting nation into a torrent of blood and tears.

With the army acting a recluse within its bases and encampments, the Houthis were left to hold the fort on their own, abandoned by the political class and the international community as they walked alone to meet Al Qaeda army.

Political U-turn

For days the Houthis have withstood Al Qaeda’s onslaught. As more tribes came to swell the ranks of the terror group, animated by a displaced sense of a religious loyalty and an irrational fear of Shia Islam, the Houthis held their ground, pushing and grinding their way into Al Qaeda territory in order to reclaim Yemen’ sovereignty over its land.

Just as many sold the Houthis to the river, predicting the faction would never recover from the losses it suffered by the hands of terror militants, Yemen suddenly woke up from its stupor.

As often in a moment of great tragedy, one single act of absolute courage can change the tide of events, however bleak and hopeless. At a time when all seemed lost, when Al Qaeda appeared poised to swallow Yemen whole under its black flag, the military swing back into action.

As of Friday the United States resumed its drone campaign against Al Qaeda, thus offering some much needed relief to the Houthis, while President Hadi finally ordered the armed forces to engage terror militants on the ground.

Following decades of intense political bickering and deep dissensions, Yemen finds itself united in its fight against terror. While observers have called the political U-turn an alliance of convenience, arguing that Washington and President Hadi seek only to deal with the most immediate threat – terror, many have begged to differ, noting that Yemen could actually have found its direction in the midst of infinite chaos.

Faced with annihilation by radicalism, Yemen factions chose for the first time to see past their disagreements and conflicting agendas in view of the nation’s interest.

With Yemen standing united behind the banner of the Houthis, the impoverished nation now stands a chance to reclaim its future. But more importantly, this new-found unity will ring the end of Saudi Arabia patronage over this unruly republic.

/149

Canada joins US wars; blowback follows

In 1968 the government of Canada decided to openly admit Americans seeking to avoid being drafted into the US war on Vietnam. Before, would-be immigrants were technically required to prove that they had been discharged from US military service. This move made it easier for Americans to escape President Johnson’s war machine by heading north.

Although a founding member of NATO, Canada did not join the United States in its war against Vietnam. The Canadian government did not see a conflict 7,000 miles away as vital to Canada’s national interest so Canada pursued its own foreign policy course, independent of the United States.

How the world has changed. Canada’s wise caution about military adventurism even at the height of the Cold War has given way to a Canada of the 21st century literally joined at Washington’s hip and eager to participate in any bombing mission initiated by the D.C. interventionists.

Considering Canada’s peaceful past, the interventionist Canada that has emerged at the end of the Cold War is a genuine disappointment. Who would doubt that today’s Canada would, should a draft be re-instated in the US, send each and every American resister back home to face prison and worse?

As Glenn Greenwald pointed out this past week:

Canada has spent the last 13 years proclaiming itself a nation at war. It actively participated in the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and was an enthusiastic partner in some of the most extremist War on Terror abuses perpetrated by the US.

Canada has also enthusiastically joined President Obama’s latest war on Iraq and Syria, pledging to send fighter jets to participate in the bombing of ISIS (and likely many civilians in the process).

But Canada’s wars abroad came back home to Canada last week.

Though horrific, it should not be a complete surprise that Canada found itself hit by blowback last week, as two attacks on Canadian soil left two Canadian military members dead.

Greenwald again points out what few dare to say about the attacks:

Regardless of one’s views on the justifiability of Canada’s lengthy military actions, it’s not the slightest bit surprising or difficult to understand why people who identify with those on the other end of Canadian bombs and bullets would decide to attack the military responsible for that violence.

That is the danger of intervention in other people’s wars thousands of miles away. Those at the other end of foreign bombs – and their surviving family members or anyone who sympathizes with them – have great incentive to seek revenge. This feeling should not be that difficult to understand.

Seeking to understand the motivation of a criminal does not mean that the crime is justified, however. We can still condemn and be appalled by the attacks while realizing that we need to understand the causation and motivation. This is common sense in other criminal matters, but it seems to not apply to attacks such as we saw in Canada last week. Few dare to point out the obvious: Canada’s aggressive foreign policy is creating enemies abroad that are making the country more vulnerable to attack rather than safer.

Predictably, the Canadian government is using the attacks to restrict civil liberties and expand the surveillance state. Like the US PATRIOT Act, Canadian legislation that had been previously proposed to give the government more authority to spy on and aggressively interrogate its citizens has been given a shot in the arm by last week’s attacks.

Unfortunately Canada has unlearned the lesson of 1968: staying out of other people’s wars makes a country more safe; following the endless war policy of its southern neighbor opens Canada up to the ugly side of blowback.

Ron Paul is former Republican congressman and three-time presidential candidate.

GJH/GJH

Fighting in S Yemen leaves 250 dead

At least 250 people have been killed in clashes between al-Qaeda-linked militants and Houthi fighters in Yemen’s southern province of al-Bayda over the past three days, security officials say.

The death figure came as the Houthi movement’s Ansarullah fighters gained more ground in battles against al-Qaeda-linked militants in the center of the country on Monday.

Latest reports said the fighters managed to secure parts of the town of Rada’ in the province of al-Bayda by flushing out the extremist militants.

Ansarullah fighters also flushed out the Takfiri militants from the southwestern Yemeni town of Yarim in the Ibb Province over the weekend.

The fighters have already taken some other parts of the Arab world’s poorest country and have also clashed with al-Qaeda militants. They have been trying to drive out the militants in order to restore security to the country.

Yemen has been facing threats from al-Qaeda-linked militants as well as a separatist movement in the country’s southern region.

Yemen’s Shia Houthi movement draws its name from the tribe of its founding leader, Hussein Badreddin al-Houthi. The Houthi movement played a key role in the popular revolution that forced former US-backed dictator, Ali Abdullah Saleh, to step down.

IA/NT/SS