Nearly 30 killed in Benghazi clashes

Fresh heavy fighting between pro-government forces and militants has claimed the lives of nearly 30 people in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi.

A Libyan army spokesperson said on Sunday the clashes have resulted in fierce exchanges of fire in different parts of Libya’s second-largest city.

“A number of army units today broke into houses of militants suspected of violence in the city in the past few months,” said Ahmad al-Mismari.

“The army has gone through fierce battles in different parts of the city, especially in the western entrance,” al-Mismari added.

The latest casualties bring the death toll since the beginning of the military operations in mid-October to at least 170.

On Wednesday night, the Libyan military forces, backed by armed supporters of former General Khalifa Haftar, entered the flashpoint city of Benghazi for the first time in two months.

Spokesman for Libya’s special forces Meloud al-Zewi said that though the new advances are a step forward in the liberation of Benghazi, there is still a long battle ahead of the Libyan army.

The new moves came after Libya’s internationally recognized Prime Minister Abdullah al-Thani announced last week that the country’s army and its allied forces were ready to recapture the capital Tripoli and Benghazi.

Libya’s government and elected parliament moved to Tobruk after an armed group from Misrata seized Tripoli and most government institutions in August.

The new Tripoli rulers have set up a rival parliament and government not recognized by the international community.

Libya plunged into chaos following the 2011 uprising that toppled longtime dictator Muammar Gaddafi. The ouster of Gaddafi gave rise to a patchwork of heavily-armed militias and deep political divisions.

The North African country has been witnessing numerous clashes between government forces and rival militia groups that refuse to lay down arms. The groups are now turning their guns on each other in an attempt to dominate politics and the country’s vast oil resources.

DB/NT/AS

Acid culprits to be dealt with ‘harshly’

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani says his administration is pursuing the recent case of acid attacks on women with all its might, adding that the culprits will be harshly dealt with.

The Iranian president said in a cabinet session on Sunday that the three ministers, tasked with following up the case, had delivered their report to the cabinet earlier in the day.

Rouhani on Thursday tasked the ministries of the interior, intelligence, and justice with launching an investigation into the sensitive case after he was briefed about the attacks against young women in Isfahan.  

President Rouhani also reassured the Iranian nation that his administration would leave no stone unturned in examining all aspects of the “inhumane” and “hideous” acts.

“The issue was an inhumane event, incompatible with any principles, and is the most heinous act that an evil person can commit in the society,” the president added.

Rouhani said the recent events in the central city of Isfahan were attempts to harm the country’s “national security and the administration will exert every effort for the establishment of security in the society.”

He added that his administration would do whatever it can to provide support for the victims of the attacks.

“No clemency” will be granted to the attacker or attackers and they will be given the maximum penalty, he further noted.

The president also warned against making “baseless accusations” against any particular person or group before the real culprits are arrested.

Reports of a spate of acid attacks against women in Isfahan have triggered grave concerns among the Iranian public and led to widespread speculations in the press and social media.

On October 20, Iranian Judiciary spokesman, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Eje’i, pledged serious and prompt action against the attacks.

IA/NT/AS

Ebola outbreak is hoax: Prof. Fetzer

The Ebola outbreak is a hoax which is being perpetrated on the American people to justify imposing martial law in the United States, a political commentator in California says.

In an interview with Press TV on Sunday, Professor James Henry Fetzer said, “The situation with Ebola is very strange indeed, because there are multiple indications that it’s some kind of fraud or hoax or scam being perpetrated on the American people.”

“There’s a new Ebola false-flag exposed, compilations of evidence [are] available on YouTube now,” he added.

A nurse who just returned from Sierra Leone has condemned the US government for a 21-day mandatory quarantine despite testing negative for the Ebola virus.

Kaci Hickox said in an article on Saturday that she was “made to feel like criminal,” after she was placed in quarantine at a New Jersey hospital upon her return from West Africa.

On Friday, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced a new policy, which requires those who had contact with Ebola patients to go through mandatory isolation for three weeks.

“This is not a situation I would wish on anyone, and I am scared for those who will follow me,” Hickox wrote in the article.

Professor Fetzer stated that “the purported Ebola outbreak is being used to justify sending troops to Sierra Leone and other West African countries.”

“There’s nothing surprising here because America continues to use its military force abroad to advance the interests of private corporations and profit-making,” he added.

The Pentagon says it is planning a 3,600-strong force to fight the Ebola epidemic in West Africa. At the moment, there are over 500 active-duty US troops in Liberia and Senegal on the mission.

“There’s good reason to be skeptical about what’s going on here in the United States. And I am terribly troubled that they are trying to create a cause that is going to instill fear into the American people to justify imposing martial law here in the United States,” Fetzer said.

“I no longer believe in the United States’ government.  It has a terrible record when it comes to telling the truth on any serious subject,” he noted.

The Ebola epidemic has already killed 4,922 out of the 10,141 known cases in eight countries, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

There is currently no known cure for Ebola, which is a form of hemorrhagic fever with diarrhea, vomiting and bleeding as its symptoms.

The Ebola virus spreads through direct contact with infected blood, feces or sweat. It can also be spread through sexual contact or the unprotected handling of contaminated corpses.

Recently, more experts have said that the Ebola virus is a genetically modified organism and was developed in US bio-warfare laboratories in West Africa.

In a recent interview, Dr. Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois said, “My opinion is that the origins of the current pandemic came out of the USA bio-warfare labs in West Africa.”

He added that the US has been “using West Africa as an offshore to circumvent the Convention on Biological Weapons and do bio-warfare work.”

GJH/GJH

NGOs Welcome United Nations General Assembly Concerns over Bahrain

On 23 October 2014, Liechtenstein delivered a statement during the interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the situation on human rights defenders, Michael Forst, expressing concern over reprisals against human rights defenders in Bahrain at the Third Committee meeting of the 69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. Americans for Democracy Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB), the Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) and the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD) welcome the statement and praise Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Iceland, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Poland, Slovenia and Sweden for supporting it.

“We are grateful to Liechtenstein and the supporting countries for expressing their concern regarding the ongoing reprisals against human rights defenders in Bahrain,” said Husain Abdulla, ADHRB’s Executive Director. “Only through pressure from the international community will the Bahraini government realize that it can no longer target human rights defenders with impunity and end such abuses.”

The statement noted with concern the Government of Bahrain’s renewed campaign against human rights defenders, which stands “in stark contrast to the acceptance by the Government of Bahrain of UPR recommendations made in 2012 regarding the abandoning of any restrictions on human rights defenders.” Supporters of the statement asked the Special Rapporteur to comment on the current engagement between the mandate and the Government of Bahrain, particularly as it pertains to scheduling a visit to the country.

“By accepting 158 recommendations provided through its 2012 Second Cycle UPR, the Government of Bahrain made a commitment to the international community that it would implement reform and end reprisals against human rights defenders. Clearly, this hasn’t happened,” said Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei, Director of Advocacy at BIRD. “We urge the Bahraini government to immediately arrange for Special Rapporteur Forst to visit the country so he may investigate the situation of human rights defenders in Bahrain.”

Supporters of the statement also noted that “several human rights defenders have been arrested or otherwise faced reprisals due to their activities on social media.” In Bahrain, the use of repressive terrorism laws from July 2013 has led to an increase in judicial reprisals against human rights defenders for expressing themselves, particularly via social media.

Nabeel Rajab, President of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights (BCHR), was arrested on 1 October 2014 and charged with insulting the Ministry of Interior and the Bahrain Defense Forces for a comment he made on his personal Twitter account. The government arrested Rajab the day after he returned from an advocacy tour in Europe, where he spoke about human rights abuses in Bahrain at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, addressed the European Parliament in Brussels, and visited foreign ministries throughout Europe.

“Not only is the supposed crime for which Rajab has been charged a clear human rights violation, but the timing of his detention indicates that he is being targeted for his human rights work,” said Sayed Yousif Almuhafdah, Vice President of BCHR. “Human rights defenders must be free to conduct their peaceful activism without fearing reprisals from their government.”

/129

What it’s really like to be a Muslim in Australia

Fatima and Hussain’s home is tucked away in a quiet street in Melbourne western suburbs.

At the entrance to the modest property there is a shoe rack, where the family and visitors remove their shoes to follow the Muslim practice of keeping the house clean.

Mohammad, 3, runs up to say hello and then runs back to his father’s side, shyness quickly overtaking his initial exuberance.

“Welcome,” Hussain says.

His wife Fatima, whose black hijab is topped with a pink and white scarf framing her face, greets us with a warm smile.

The couple do not want their real names used, but they still want other Victorians to understand why they follow Shia Islam, one of the two major denominations of the religion. The other is Sunni.

“We all follow the same calender, the same practice, there are only a few opinions in history that are different,” says Hussain, an IT worker.

Their day starts before sunrise with a prayer in their specially designated room. It is the first of five obligatory daily prayers.

“You are taught from early childhood how to pray and there are rulings on prayers, where to pray, how you can pray, and the need to be clean,” Hussain explains.

“Shi’ites pray on either a sand tablet, or wood or stone, anything made out of nature or stone.

“Other sects also pray on mats or carpet. But it is the same prayer.”

The couple, both 29, came to Australia from India in 2008 because of its religious tolerance, strong economy and to allow Fatima to complete a masters degree in professional accounting.

Mohammed, who flits between riding a trike and drawing as his father talks, was born at Sunshine Hospital and his parents became Australian citizens two years ago.

Like most preschoolers, Mohammed is a fan of The Wiggles and Busy Beavers.

He is delighted when his father plays a video on his smartphone of The Wheels on the Bus go Round and Round.

When he is older he will attend a Sunday school that combines cultural and religious teachings.

Fatima works three days a week at one of major banks and on these days the couple leaves home together about 7.30am and Mohammed is dropped off at daycare.

She wears the hijab whenever she leaves the house or if male visitors come to her house.

“For me, it’s a part of me, it is a symbol of modesty, and it also brings me closer to Allah. I think I am more confident, more secure when I wear hijab,” she says.

Hussain says he and his wife both grew up with strong family values and apart from religious gatherings, they spend most of their time at home.

“We do go out with other families. I have friends who are Hindus or Christians, atheists,

I have never had issues,” Hussain says.

“The only thing is, it’s a tradition, it’s a culture and it’s a religion, that doesn’t allow much interaction between the men and women, so we try and limit it to women meeting women and men meeting men.”

Their second prayer of the day is around lunchtime.

“I have enough good bosses; they allow me an extra 15 minutes of my break to go and pray.

I don’t smoke, I don’t go out for other free breaks, it is part of the deal,” Hussain says.

He says prayer is a form of submitting to God.

“When you go and bow down to him then you say, ‘OK, apart from all that I have achieved, what I have and all that I will have, the family, the kids, the money, the house, I stand here right in front of you, feeble and weak, asking for forgiveness if I have sinned’.”

Hussain says he is left with a feeling that God is right inside him.

“You feel peace, you feel marvellous.”

The couple have a local cleric they speak to about day-to-day issues and they travel to the mosque in St Albans for important dates on the Islamic calender.

“We have a gathering every Thursday with friends and family and do a few religious reading to understand the religion better,” Hussain says.

Tonight they sit down a meal of curry and bread, but they are just as likely to eat lasagne or burritos.

“We eat everything, the only thing is the meat used it is halah and no pork,” he says.

“We don’t have a problem with other people eating it (pork), it’s that we can’t eat it,” he says.

“That is the same with alcohol. A Muslim is always on duty in front of God. If you have wine you are not in your senses. You lose your sense for a bit or two and you are not under the divine law of God.”

Hussain regularly cooks and assists with the housework, though Fatima finds her days off work filled with cooking, cleaning and washing.

Before eating, they say a prayer that always begins with: “In the name of Allah, the compassionate, the merciful.”

“These are the words of the Holy Koran, 113 of the 114 chapters start with this verse,’ Hussain says.

“It really surprises me what people nowadays say on the name of Islam or on the name of religion are killing each other.

“I don’t know what kind of book they are following, but the Lord I follow has said, read this, that in the name of the Lord that is most compassionate and merciful.”

After dinner, they play with Mohammad, who loves kicking the ball and swinging a small bat as though he is playing cricket. He goes to sleep with rhymes and a bottle of milk.

Hussain and Fatima watch a little TV, usually the news and documentaries and programs such as The Block and Masterchef.

“We try to go to bed early because you have to get up early for prayers again in the morning.”

SAARA Sabbagh, 42, and Ramzi Elsayed, 48, have a stunning view of Kinglake National Park from their loungeroom window.

The room, decorated with artwork depicting Middle Eastern architecture and Arabic script, also doubles as the place of prayer for the married couple and their daughter Saajeda.

Like all followers of Islam, they wake before sunrise for the first prayer of the day.

It’s a time for the family to come together before the pace picks up for work and school.

“We’ll begin with our morning prayer and then throughout the day as we go along, whether I’m at work, my husband’s at work and Saaj’s at school, we fit our daily schedule around the prayer times,” Ms Sabbagh says.

“We look at it like a meditation. It is like when you take time out for either a coffee break or a tea break. For me, it’s a meditation break,” Ms Sabbagh says.

Year 11 student Saajeda, who is a keen netballer and netball coach, says she plans her days accordingly.

“If I know I’m going to go shopping and my afternoon prayer will start at 1pm, I’ll probably leave at 1.10pm. There’s no point in leaving at 12.30pm and praying at the shops and putting myself in an uncomfortable situation.”

“At school and at netball it’s a bit difficult, but you get around it.”

The household is quieter since their two older children married, but both still live nearby. They bucked the general Australian trend of leaving marriage until their late 20s, early 30s.

“The reason people choose to marry young in the Islamic tradition is those who are practicising the faith will adhere to the idea that there is no relationship outside of a marriage,” Ms Sabbagh says.

A former accountant Mr Elsayed now runs a wholesale business selling carpets and mats.

His parents were Lebanese Muslims who come separately to Australia in the 1950s and met and married here. He was born in Colac and his family moved tnorth-easterns northeastern suburbs in the late 1960s.

The former president of the Islamic Council of Victoria has worked tirelessly in the community to help build bridges between Muslims and non-Muslims and feels some of that work is being undone by the alarm over terrorism.

“That temperature is rising in the community and people are feeling unsafe, that is the sad part. The goodwill is being eroded, because one of the things we have to have as a community is safety.”

Sabbagh says it has made her more protective of Saajeda.

“How that affects our family is, for example, when she’s training at netball, I won’t let her travel on her own to the courts anymore, or use public transport,” she says. “So we’ve had to make adjustments to our life.”

However, they believe goodwill is prevailing.

Ms Sabbagh, who migrated to Australia at the age of 6 with her Syrian family from Lebanon, works part-time at Benevolence Australia.

“It has a focus on spiritualism, derived from the Islamic ethos, and health and wellbeing,” she says.

She also visits schools to talk and run workshops about understanding Islam and what it means to be a Muslim in today’s world.

“Often it’s the same questions: Why do you wear a headscarf? Do you get hot in that? The whole terrorism questions,” she says.

She enjoys debunking the stereotypes and talking about what Islam means to her.

“I’m not Muslim because I have to wear a headscarf — that’s not pleasant sometimes — I’m not a Muslim because I have to fast or pay charity. I’m Muslim because there is a purpose in my creation and I connect to a higher source,” she says.

“And there is a spiritual dimension, the disciplining of the inner self, the character, character-building, that is why I am Muslim.”

Saajeda stopped playing netball for a few years when she started wearing her scarf becself consciou sself-conscious.

“I think in year 9 I started again. I’m really inclined to doing sport, I’m not into going to the gym or working out, that bores me. But I’m into playing sport and being competitive. I missed it,” she says.

However, there were a few hurdles at the start.

“When I first started playing in games, they would always say ‘No, you are not allowed to play’ or ‘You can keep your scarf on, but you have to take your pants off.’ I’d go, ‘No, that’s not going to happen’,” Saajeda says.

Mr Elsayed says a lot of work has been done over the years to educate sporting groups about the need for Muslim girls and women to remain covered during play.

Saajeda, who is studying English language, psychology, legal studies and sociology at the Centre of Adult Education, has grown up without TV — not for religious reasons, her parents think it’s too mind-numbing — and is disinterested in social media.

“I used to have Facebook. I’m currently on and off with it. Social media used to be a big thing, but now it has died down for me personally. Instagram I use, on my phone, but that’s about it,” she says. “It was tiring to keep up with everything.”

She says the structure of Islam has helped her through her teenage years.

“I think all teenagers have that lost period, ‘Who am I?’ I think all Muslims have that too, ‘Do I want to be Muslim?’ Once you go through that period of, ‘Yeah, I do, I love this and I enjoy this’, you come out of it stronger.

“I have heaps of family who used to wear the scarf and then take it off, you go through that, it’s all about what you feel on the inside.

“You get your low times and you get your high times, I know my boundaries.

“I like the structure and doing the right things because of my faith.”





/129

Militants’ shells hit Damascus, Aleppo

Mortar shells fired by foreign-backed Takfiri militants have hit residential areas in the Syrian capital, Damascus, and the northwestern city of Aleppo, killing three people, Press TV reports.

According to the report, more than six mortar shells hit residential area of Mezze in western Damascus, killing one person and injuring at least ten others on Sunday.

In a separate terrorist attack, several shells fired by militants fell on the al-Seryan neighborhood in Aleppo, killing two people including a child. The report further said that 24 others sustained injuries in the deadly attack in the northwestern city.

Cities and towns across Syria have frequently come under mortar and rocket fire by foreign-sponsored militants since unrest erupted in the Arab country over three years ago.

The terrorist attacks came after significant victories by the Syrian army against militants across the crisis-hit country.

The so-called Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on October 22 that Syrian ground forces backed by airstrikes liberated the town of Morek from the militants belonging to the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front.

Morek is considered a significant town as it is located on the main road linking the Syrian capital to the country’s largest city of Aleppo in the northwest.

Syria has been gripped by deadly violence since 2011. Western powers and some of their regional allies – especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey – are reportedly supporting the militants operating in Syria.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Zeid al-Hussein has said that more than 200,000 people have died in the Syrian conflict since March 2011.

IA/NT/SS

1 in 5 Eurozone banks facing shortfalls

The European Central Bank says one in five Eurozone banks is grappling with financial problems with Italy’s banks hit hardest by the ongoing crisis.

The ECB said on Sunday that 13 of Europe’s top banks have failed an in-depth review of their finances and need to increase their capital buffers against losses by 10 billion euros (USD 12.5 billion).

“A total of 25 billion capital shortfalls were identified across 25 participating banks as a joint result of the AQR (Asset Quality Review) and the stress test,” ECB Vice President Vitor Constancio said, adding, “Out of the 25, 12 banks have already taken measures in 2014 that are enough to cover their shortfall.”

“There are then 13 banks that still have either to exactly apply their restructuring downsize as it is foreseen in their plans with the European Commission, or they will have to come up with ways to increase their capital,” he added.

Constancio made the statement based on a crunch audit aimed at preventing a repeat of the financial crisis that nearly led to the euro’s collapse.

The ECB, however, said 25 banks still need 25 billion euros to guarantee themselves against any future crises.

The worst results were seen in Italy, where nine banks failed, as well as in Greece and Cyprus with three each.

Even Germany, which has been doing well with exports, is witnessing a slowing growth on the back of weak investment.

The ECB has been criticized for similar stress tests, carried out by the EU in 2010 and 2011, which gave a pass to banks that later needed bailouts.

DB/NT/SS

 

Pentagon, Big Oil, and Zionist lobby

There is no question that, in the immediate aftermath and for several years following US military conquests, wars, occupations and sanctions, US multi-national corporations lost out on profitable sites for investments. The biggest losses were in the exploitation of natural resources – in particular, gas and oil – in the Middle East, the Persian Gulf and South Asia.

As a result some observers speculated that there were deep fissures and contradictory interests within the US ruling class. They argued that, on the one hand, political elites linked to pro-Israel lobbies and the military industrial power configuration, promoted a highly militarized foreign policy agenda and, on the other hand, some of the biggest and wealthiest multi-national corporations sought diplomatic solutions.

Yet this seeming ‘elite division’ did not materialize. There is no evidence for example that the multi-national oil companies sought to oppose the Iraq, Libyan, Afghan, Syrian wars. Nor did the powerful 10 largest oil companies with a net value of over $1.1 trillion mobilize their lobbyists and influentials in the mass media to the cause of peaceful capital penetration and domination of the oil fields via neo-liberal political clients.

In the run-up to the Iraq war, the three major US oil companies, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Conoco Phillips, eager to exploit the third largest oil reserves in the world, did not engage in Congressional lobbying or exert pressure on the Bush or later Obama Administration for a peaceful resolution of the conflict. At no point did the Big Ten challenge the pro-war Israel lobby and its phony arguments that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction with an alternative policy.

Similar “political passivity” was evidenced in the run-up to the Libyan war. Big Oil was actually signing off on lucrative oil deals, when the militarists in Washington struck again – destroying the Libyan state and tearing asunder the entire fabric of the Libyan economy.

Big Oil may have bemoaned the loss of oil and profits but there was no concerted effort, before or after the Libyan debacle, to critically examine or evaluate the loss of a major oil producing region. In the case of economic sanctions against Iran, possessing the second largest oil reserves, the MNC again were notable by their absence from the halls of Congress and the Treasury Department where the sanctions policy was decided. Prominent Zionist policymakers, Stuart Levey and David Cohen designed and implemented sanctions which prevented US (and EU) oil companies from investing or trading with Tehran.

In fact, despite the seeming divergence of interest between a highly militarized foreign policy and the drive of MNC to pursue the global accumulation of capital, no political conflicts erupted. The basic question that this paper seeks to address is: Why did the major MNC submit to an imperial foreign policy which resulted in lost economic opportunities?

Why the MNC fail to oppose imperial militarism

There are several possible hypotheses accounting for the MNC accommodation to a highly militarized version of imperial expansion.

In the first instance, the CEO’s of the MNC may have believed that the wars, especially the Iraq war, would be short-term, and would lead to a period of stability under a client regime willing and able to privatize and de-nationalize the oil and gas sector. In other words, the petrol elites bought into the arguments of Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, that the invasion and conquest would “pay for itself”.

Secondly, even after the prolonged-decade long destructive war and the deepening sectarian conflict, many CEOs believed that a lost decade would be compensated by “long term” gain. They believed that future profits would flow, once the country was stabilized. The oil majors entry after 2010; however, was immediately threatened by the ISIS offensive. The ‘time frame’ of the MNC strategic planners was understated if not totally wrong headed.

Thirdly, most CEOs believed that the US-NATO invasion of Libya would lead to monopoly ownership and greater profits than what they received from a public-private partnership with the Gadhafi regime. The oil majors believed that they would secure total or majority control. In other words the war would allow the oil MNC to secure monopoly profits for an extended period. Instead the end of a stable partnership led to a Hobbesian world in which anarchy and chaos inhibited any large scale, long-term entry of MNC.

Fourthly, the MNC, including the Big Oil corporations, have invested in hundreds of sites in dozens of countries. They are not tied to a single location. They depend on the militarized imperial state to defend their global interests. Hence they probably are not willing to contest or challenge the militarists in, say Iraq, for fear that it might endanger US imperial intervention in other sites.

Fifthly, many MNC interlock across economic sectors: they invest in oil fields and refineries; banking, financing and insurance as well as extractive sectors. To the degree that MNC capital is diversified they are less dependent on a single region, sector, or source for profit. Hence destructive wars, in one or several countries, may not have as great a prejudicial effect as in the past when “Big Oil” was just ‘oil’.

Six, the agencies of the US imperial state are heavily weighted to military rather than economic activity. The international bureaucracy of the US is overwhelmingly made up of military, intelligence and counter-insurgency officials. In contrast, China, Japan, Germany and other emerging states (Brazil, Russia and India) have a large economic component in their overseas bureaucracy. The difference is significant. US MNC do not have access to economic officials and resources in the same way as China’s MNC. The Chinese overseas expansion and its MNC, is built around powerful economic support systems and agencies. US MNC have to deal with Special Forces, spooks and highly militarized ‘aid officials’. In other words the CEO’s who look for “state support” perforce have mostly ‘military’ counterparts who view the MNC as instruments of policy rather than as subjects of policy.

Seventh, the recent decade has witnessed the rise of the financial sector as the dominant recipient of State support. As a result, big banks exercise major influence on public policy. To the extent that is true, much of what is ‘oil money’ has gone over to finance and profits accrue by pillaging the Treasury. As a result, oil interests merge with the financial sector and their ‘profits’ are as much dependent on the state as on exploiting overseas sites.

Eighth, while Big Oil has vast sums of capital, its diverse locations, multiple activities and dependence on state protection (military), weaken its opposition to US wars in lucrative oil countries. As a result other powerful pro-war lobbies which have no such constraints have a free hand. For example the pro-Israel power configuration has far less ‘capital’ than any of the top ten oil companies. But it has a far greater number of lobbyists with much more influence over Congress people. Moreover, it has far more effective propaganda – media leverage than Big Oil. Many more critics of US foreign policy, including its military and sanctions policies, are willing to criticize “Big Oil” than Zionist lobbies.

Finally the rise of domestic oil production resulting from fracking opens new sites for Big Oil to profit outside of the Middle East – even though the costs may be higher and the duration shorter. The oil industry has replaced losses in Middle East sites (due to wars) with domestic investments.

Nevertheless, there is tension and conflict between oil capital and militarism. The most recent case is between Exxon-Mobil’s plans to invest $38 billion in a joint venture in the Russian Arctic with the Russian oil grant Rosneft. Obama’s sanctions against Russia is scheduled to shut down the deal much to the dismay of the senior executives of Exxon Mobil, who have already invested $3.2 billion in an area the size of Texas.

Conclusion

The latent conflicts and overt difference between military and economic expansion may eventually find greater articulation in Washington. However, up to now, because of the global structures and orientation of the oil industry, because of their dependence on the military for ‘security’, the oil industry in particular, and the MNC in general, have sacrificed short and middle term profits for “future gains” in the hopes that the wars will end and lucrative profits will return.

James Petras is a retired Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at Binghamton University in Binghamton, New York and adjunct professor at Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada who has published prolifically on Latin American and Middle Eastern political issues.

GJH/GJH

Qom Friday Prayer: “US, UK and Zionist entity are Yazid’s of our time”

During his Friday prayer sermon in the holy city of Qom, Hujjat al-Islam Sayyed Mohammad Sa’idi, the trustee of the Holy Shrine of Lady Fatimah al-Ma’sumah (S), spoke of current events and tied the great injustices facing Muslim states in the current era with the evil and tyranny which faced Imam Husayn (A).

His Eminence offered his condolences on the death of Ayatollah Mohammad-Reza Mahdavi-Kani, a high-ranking Iranian politician and Islamic scholar who passed away on October 21st. Hujjat al-Islam Sa’idi remembered this great scholar as an “ethical role model” and a “knowledgeable jurisprudent of our time.”

Regarding world events, Hujjat al-Islam Sa’idi mentioned the Iraqi prime minister’s three-day visit to Iran last week saying Prime Minister Haydar al-Abadi met with the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution [Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei] who expressed his strong support for the Iraqi government and insisted that “Iraq and Iraq have the ability to fight against terrorism and solve their problems without foreign interference.” Qom’s Friday prayer leader also appreciated former Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki his resignation for the sake of the unity of Iraq.

Regarding Muharram and Safar, the sorrowful months of mourning which begin Sunday, Hujjat al-Islam Sa’idi stated that these two months are “Days of God.” The goals of Imam Husayn’s (A) uprising were to stand up for truth, justice and to establish the true religion (Islam). The beloved grandson of the Prophet Muhammad (S) strove to re-establish divine Islamic law and to destroy the oppressive government of the  caliph Yazid ibn Mu’awiyah, a well-known enemy of the Ahlul-Bayt

His Eminence emphasized that the “Leader of the Martyrs” rose to eradicate all kinds of corruption – both internal and external corruption. He stated that external corruption refers to the fight against the evil tyrant Yazid. Internal corruption refers to the fight against the ignorance of the people. Imam Husayn (A) gave his blood so that people would wake up from their ignorance and misdirection.

Hujjat al-Islam Sa’idi added that the United States, United Kingdom and the Zionist regime (Israel) are the “Yazid’s of our time.” “When we introduce the personality and the goals of the uprising of Imam Husayn (A) against Yazid, we must introduce the Yazid’s of our time as well,” he explained.

The renowned scholar advised that during their sermons in Muharram and Safar, preachers should use their powerful and influential voices to remove any distortions and doubts faced by the people and to speak about moral issues, teach religious laws and self-purification, and to also pay attention to youth issues. “Strengthening the faith of the people prevents the people, especially the youth, from getting caught in the traps of the enemies,” Hujjat al-Islam Sa’idi stated.